Clinton and Bush -- The Cause of School Shootings
The majority of school shootings have taken place during Bill
Clinton and George W. Bush's reign. Precisely forty out of forty
two shootings. Since its inception, America has always had guns
and schools coexisting at about the same time. Yet amazingly
forty shootings have taken place during their presidency!
Consider also that these forty shootings took place during a
period when the number of gun laws and restrictions was growing!
At least during the Clinton regime.
Note that I am only including intentional shootings, not
accidental gun discharges. Nor am I counting the incidents of
carnage involving the use of a car (as in California in 1999) or
any other type of instrument. The list of school shootings
during the reign of Clinton is as follows: February 9, 1992.
Stockton, California, high school, 2 dead. May 1, 1992.
Brooklyn, New York, high school, 4 dead, 9 wounded. January 12,
1993. Miami, Florida, high school, 1 dead. January 18, 1993.
Grayson, Kentucky, high school, 2 dead. March 25, 1993. St.
Louis, Missouri, high school, 1 wounded. May 24, 1993.
Pennsburg, Pennsylvania, high school, 1 dead. April 8, 1994.
Maryland high school, 1 wounded. February 2, 1996. Moses Lake,
Washington, junior high school, 3 dead, 1 wounded. April
15,1996. Washington, District of Columbia, high school, 1
wounded. February 19, 1997. Bethel, Alaska, high school, 2 dead,
2 wounded. May 1, 1997. New York City, New York, high school, 1
wounded. October 1, 1997. Pearl, Mississippi, high school, 2
dead, 7 wounded. December 1, 1997. West Peducah, Kentucky, high
school, 3 dead, 5 wounded. December 15, 1997. Stamps, Arkansas,
2 wounded. March 24, 1998. Jonesboro, Arkansas, middle school, 5
dead, 10 wounded. April 24, 1998. Edinboro, Pennsylvania, middle
school, 1 dead. April 28, 1998. Pomona, California, elementary
school, 2 dead, 1 wounded. May 19, 1998. Fayetteville,
Tennessee, high school, 1 dead. May 21, 1998. Springfield,
Oregon, high school, 2 dead. June 15, 1998. Richmond, Virginia,
high school, 2 wounded. April 20, 1999. Littleton, Colorado,
high school, 15 dead, 28 wounded. May 20, 1999. Conyers,
Georgia, high school, 6 wounded. November 19, 1999. Deming, New
Mexico, middle school, 1 dead. December 6, 1999. Fort Gibson,
Oklahoma, middle school, 4 wounded. February 29, 2000. Mount
Morris Township, Michigan, elementary school, 1 dead. May 26,
2000. Lake Worth, Florida, middle school, 1 dead. September 26,
2000. New Orleans, Carter G. Woodson Middle School, 2 wounded.
August 28, 2000. Fayetteville, Arkansas, University of Arkansas,
2 dead.
So the body count during Clinton's war on America is fifty one
dead and eighty three wounded. The list of school shootings
prior to and after Clinton are as follows: August 1, 1966.
Austin, Texas, college, 14 dead. July 12, 1976. Fullerton,
California, college, 7 dead, 2 wounded. March 5, 2001. Santee,
California, high school, 2 dead 13 wounded. March 7, 2001.
Williamsport, Pennsylvania, high school, 1 wounded. March 22,
2001. El Cajon, California, high school, 5 wounded. March 30,
2001. Gary, Indiana, high school, 1 dead. January 15, 2002. New
York, New York, 2 wounded. January 16, 2002. Grungy, Virginia,
law school, 3 dead, 3 wounded. 2003, Case Western Reserve
University Law School, 1 dead, 2 wounded. Jan 10, 2003, Orlando,
Florida, middle school, 1 dead. September 2003, Cold Spring, MN,
high School, 2 dead. March 21, 2005, Bemidji, MN, high school,
10 dead, 15 wounded. October 20, 2005, Saginaw, MI, high school,
1 wounded. November 8, 2005, Jacksboro, TN, high school, 1 dead,
2 wounded.
The body count for all non Clinton school shootings is forty two
dead and thirty six wounded. What is the explanation for the
fact that 96 percent of the school shootings have taken place
during Clinton (aka Bubba) and George W. Bush's (aka Dubya)
presidency? Let us now consider some possible explanations.
During the pre Clinton era, there weren't enough gun laws. Yet,
in that same Wild West pre Clinton era, there were only two
school shootings! That is to say, during the 215 years (1776 to
1991) of American history, guns were more readily available to
our children. Obviously the explanation for the increase in
shootings during his reign is not the lack of gun laws.
Is the explanation to be found in the prevalence of drugs?
Drugs, whether they are legal or illegal, have been used in
America for a long time. Plus, if you count alcohol as a drug,
then surely in America's past when its availability was not as
highly regulated and the social morality of its use ebbed and
flowed, there would have been a good number of school shootings.
However, there wasn't. The only pre Clinton school shootings
took place in August 1966 in Austin, Texas, and in July 1976 in
Fullerton, California.
The decade of the 1980s, according to the liberal media, was the
decade of greed. A decade when the rich got richer and the poor
got poorer. The decade of Reagan and trickle down economics. So
then why wasn't there any school shootings then?
So then let us posit a possible explanation, for discussion,
that the cause of the school shootings in the Clinton era (which
takes up most of the 1990s) was due to greed. If this
explanation were true, then we have to ask what quantum of greed
was necessary to cause two school shootings prior to his
presidency? Next, how much more greed was present in America
during Clinton's presidency in order to cause twenty eight
school shootings? Why was there such a tremendous increase in
greed during Clinton's presidency over all other president's
combined? Plus, why did the greed factor go down in 1995? That
was the only year of his presidency in which there were no
school shootings.
Additionally, how could greed possibly be the explanation since
the 1990s are not a decade of greed? What do we mean by stating
that greed might be the explanation for the school shootings? Do
we mean to say that the shooters were greedy? Or that the
victims were greedy? Who was greedy? Was it the then current
president? Who was it? Surely that is important to know. Plus,
how much greed was necessary to initiate the school shootings?
Are we to believe that if a certain person or persons have a
certain amount of greed, then that will cause school children to
grab guns and start shooting people at school? Greed is not
therefore the cause of the school shootings. Greed alone can't
explain why 96 percent of the school shootings happened during
Bubba and Dubya's presidency versus being statistically spread
out during the majority of the other president's terms.
Could we offer in explanation that our schools during Bubba and
Dubya's terms have been unsafe or are more unsafe? If that were
true then we would have to state that in the pre Clinton years,
when schools were safe or safer, that there were only two
shootings. So how were schools different back then? Simple--back
then schools didn't have metal detectors, mandatory uniforms,
zero tolerance policies, class sizes were larger, there were not
as many gun laws as now, and there was greater access to guns.
Additionally, about thirty years ago, prayers were routinely
said in class, as was the pledge of allegiance, and classes were
always taught in English.
I would offer that the only primary explanation is that Satan is
causing these tragic events. This is the opportune time for him
to act. In light of the numerous examples of Clinton's acts of
the sinful nature, it is apparent that he belongs to the Devil.
"He who does what is sinful is of the devil, because the devil
has been sinning from the beginning....This is how we know who
the children of God are and who the children of the devil are:
Anyone who does not do what is right is not a child of God" (1
John 3:8, 10). Christ said of the devil, "The thief comes only
to steal and kill and destroy" (John 10:10).All people are born
in sin and are members of Satan's tribe, so to speak.
So where does Dubya fit in? Easy. The bible says; "But now I am
writing you that you must not associate with anyone who calls
himself a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater
or a slanderer, a drunkard or a swindler. With such a man do not
even eat." 1 Cor. 5:11. Dubya has from day one worked to protect
and honor the spirit of the anti Christ in Bubba. Remember that
on the day of Dubya's first inauguration, when there was a boat
load of evidence that the Clintons and their ilk defaced,
destroyed, and stole property from the White House, Dubya firmly
put his foot down to make sure there was only an appearance of
an investigation into those acts.
Continuing on during Dubya's presidency, we find that he and his
father have grown closer and closer to Bubba and his wife.
Numerous articles have been written about this budding romance.
See for example the following articles; (1) Conservatives Irked
Over BushClinton Loveless, June 15, 2004 Newsman article; (2)
Presidents: Bubba and Dubya-Warming Up, January 8, 2005, MSNBC
article; (3) Clinton, Bush in Super Bowl Tsunami Pitch, January
27, 2005, Newsman article; (4) Bush Picks Brains of Clinton,
Father, April 9, 2005, Washington times article; (5) President
Asks Bush and Clinton to Assist In Hurricane Relief Effort,
September 1, 2005, The White House press release.
Clearly God said to have nothing to do with such a brother as
quoted above. Bubba certainly fills that description. Even more
certain is both Bush's flagrantly violating God's Word. Dubya
has even said in effect that only Bubba could understand his
life since they are both presidents. What that really is saying
is that because both of us are sinners, and we share the same
job description (or life experience, or had the same women, or
robbed the same people, et cetera), it is only natural and
beneficial that we have dinner together. That we have fellowship
together. Yet God said to have nothing to do with that sinner.
Not even have dinner with him or her.
It thus seems to me that we must conclude that God is wrong.
That 2nd Corinthians was but inspired vacuous verbal vomit (IV3
or cubed). That Mark is all fouled up. However, the reality is
that by living the lives they have, these two men alone have
provided an opportunity for 96% of all school shootings to take
place in America. Some say even though Satan came but to steal,
kill, and destroy, this aberrant statistic is meaningless. All
those who were killed, wounded, and their ravaged families are
just supposed to be "comforted" and deal with their loss while
we are told to trust these two men? How about agreeing with
God's Word? Especially after seeing the devastation the
disobedience of Bubba and Dubya have caused on America.
It is the citizens of the kingdom of darkness that are expected
to continuously exhibit the fruits of the sinful nature as
mentioned in Galatians 5 above. This was mentioned by the
apostle John in 1 John 3:9. He wrote, "No one who is born of God
will continue to sin, because God's seed remains in him; he
cannot go on sinning, because he has been born of God." Clearly,
by examining the actions of Clinton as provided in my book, the
only conclusion to be reached is that he belongs to Satan.
Clinton enjoys incredible favor with the Devil. It can be said
that as far as the United States is concerned, he is the Devil's
number one.
Why was this the opportune time for the Devil to cause 67
percent of the school shootings in America? And 96% of them
during Bubba and Dubya's presidency. That is the question, my
friend. That is the question that must be answered so that
appropriate action can be taken. Let us examine another element
of the ballyhooed Clinton legacy. That is the extraordinary
increase in "hate" web sites as tracked by the Simon Wiesenthal
Center. According to them, the number of hate web sites prior to
the Oklahoma City bombing was only four. Afterwards, it grew to
over 2,500! Naturally we have to ask why the sudden increase
after that act of domestic terrorism.
You will recall that the Oklahoma City bombing happened on April
15, 1995. That year was the only year in which no school
shootings took place during his reign. The Oklahoma bombing
killed 168 Americans. We know that according to Jesus (as
recorded in the book of John, chapters 8:44 and 10:10), Satan
"...was a murder from the beginning, not holding to the truth,
for there is no truth in him," and "The thief comes only to
steal kill and destroy."
Could the twenty eight school shootings have taken place during
Clinton's time as president out of mere coincidence? Or was it
rather that during his reign, the time was right for Satan to
come in and kill 219 people and wound about 100 others though
these two means alone? What are the possible reasons to explain
the explosive growth in hate sites on the Internet? Is it Gore's
fault since he claims to have invented the Internet? Why should
the incredible ease to post opinions and stories on the Internet
give rise to such a tremendous number of hate sites since 1995?
Could it be that all the people haters suddenly went online in
1995? That's not a likely explanation, so what other reason
could there be? Were all the people haters suddenly paid to
spread their message on the Internet? Was all this hate
mongering a part of a vast left wing conspiracy? If so, where is
the evidence to support such an explanation? Moreover, why did
the sites pop up after the Oklahoma bombing? Was this all part
of a well orchestrated ploy by Attorney General Janet Reno to
discredit the Internet and demonstrate a reason for its being
regulated, licensed, and taxed by the federal government?
One thing is for sure--it is easy to demonstrate that the
continuous actions and words of Clinton and his administration
testify that they are citizens of Satan's kingdom. Therefore, it
should not be surprising that Satan used this man's time in
office, and Dubya's embrace of him, to spread death and
destruction all across America. This result should be as much
expected by Americans as the daily rising of the sun in the
east.
Scripture taken from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION,