According to a Dayton Daily News article by Terry Kinney (Associated Press):

Doctors in Ohio should be allowed to administer the abortion pill RU-486 as freely as in other states, Planned Parenthood lawyers told a three-judge federal appeals court panel Wednesday.

Maybe, Planned Parenthood, the State of Ohio can decide how their doctors will administer the abortion pill in their state. I might be wrong, but I think that is the whole, "let the states decide" thing. If you do not like their decisions, feel free to move to a more pro-death state.

I would also like to think that maybe the Doctors can individually decide when they will implement such a pill that would thus terminate the life of an unborn child.

Or, here is an even better idea: stop killing babies! Yes, the RU-486 pill kills unborn children. Whether that child is 'viable' or not is irrelevant and it has nothing to do with life.

"What the state is doing is forcing physicians to follow a regimen based on outdated science," said Nicole Berner, a lawyer with Washington, D.C.-based Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Did Ms. Berner ever study biology or take sexual education in high school? Even in public schools, conception is mentioned. Embryos are mentioned.

Here is some very up-to-date science: those dreaded fetuses Planned Parenthood seem to abhor so much are developing human beings. The most development that will ever take place in every human being's lifetime is from the moment of conception, a single-cell organism, up until it becomes a so-called 'viable' human being. How can something develop from a single-cell organism into something else if it is not alive?

Now, that little insignificant single-cell organism is a human cell. That cell then divides into a multiple-cell organism. In some cases, the organims divide into two separate organisms. That is what we call twins, Planned Parenthood.

But, guess what, Planned Parenthood? All of those cells are living cells? They are just as alive as any other being made up of cells.

Now, unless something has changed since the beginning of time, that is about as up-to-date as you can get with science.

I would not want to let facts or logic get in the way of your agenda, Planned Parenthood.

Here is another idea you might want to espouse in your whole 'pro-choice' agenda. Maybe you can start pushing a pro-responsible-choice. Everything boils down to a choice. Each choice one makes comes with consequences, either good or bad.

Indulge me a little bit and let me make a comparison. Let's say I make the bad choice to go to a bar, get drunk, and decide to drive home. Now, let's say a police officer sees me driving impaired and decides to pull me over. Well, I don't want to have to live with the consequences of my actions. So, can I be "pro-choice" and choose to do something to the officer to get away from facing the consequences of my first choice to drive drunk (of course, I would never actually advocate such action)?

So, now we have seen how my irresponsible actions and decisions can lead to something I would not like. The best way to avoid those consequences would be for me to - get ready for this - not drink and drive!

The same rings true with the consequences of getting pregnant when you might not want to. With the exception of rape or molestation, sexual conduct is performed by two consenting individuals. Regardless of how responsible of a decision that may be, it is still a decision. After the action of sexual intercourse, it is possible that a woman may become pregnant. According to Planned Parenthood, it is now time to make the choice to let the innocent child live or not. Why? Did that child choose who was going to have sex and thus create him or her? Did that child do anything deserving of death? Why should someone have to die as a consequence of another's actions?

Even in the case of rape, does the child have to die because of the father's sins? No. The man who raped that woman deserves to spend the rest of his life in prison, or maybe even have that lifetime shortened a little bit, courtesy of the American criminal justice system. But, that child should be allowed to live in a loving household, whether it be with the biological mother or another family who would make him or her one of their own. As hard as it may be on that woman, it will be even harder on that child if he or she is killed.

Planned Parenthood, perhaps you should leave Ohio well enough alone. Maybe you can even take a good hard look at the real facts and see what your so-called 'operations' are doing. Those lives you take are not yours for the taking. None of your 'up-to-date' science measures up to the true facts about life, nor does it justify your agenda in killing babies!

Copyright 2005 - John St. Michael

1. Kinney, Terry (Associated Press). Planned Parenthood: Abortion Pill Law Based on Outdated Science. Dayton Daily News [ONLINE]. 2005. http://www.daytondailynews.com/localnews/content/localnews/daily/1208ohabort.html