Monitoring References and Data in Online Political Debates

Online Political Debates and Forums sure get out of hand quickly, as the debates so often turn to personal attacks. Of course when this happens all is lost as the issues become clouded and the purpose of the debate is lost. Online debate forums therefore need a strong set of moderators and collaboration between the moderators with specific and pre-defined guidelines, which must be adhered to.

That sounds time consuming and it can be extremely challenging, so each moderator must be certain that they can perform? They need to ask themselves; what have they ever done in their life that makes them believe that they are up for it? It is a lot of work. Often it is advised to have third party verifiers and third party research to back it up.

If an online debater posts a comment then at the end of each paragraph or every couple they should put reference links to the supporting data, not allowing them to put them at the end after the reader forgets. As these political commentators write innuendo after innuendo and then at the end quote a "news" article as if any of that is real. I have been in the "news" all my life and never once had the reporter got the story exactly correct.

http://www.carwashguys.com/history/museum1.shtml

http://www.carwashguys.com/innews.html

A moderator should check up on all the references and make sure they are valid, credible and support the comment. One also should ask;