The first woman to rise to the top in 4 1/2 months in her short lived network marketing career was "rocking and rolling" in a fraudulent manner. When you are caught with your hand in the cookie jar, why wouldn't the company terminate someone for that?

I'm glad to see that this company has a firm hand when someone scams them. Why do you think that rules are set in place by companies?

This person hurt a lot of people in her "rocking and rolling" months and had so many complaints to headquarters in her short time in moving up. So many complaints of how she was conducting her business and what she was doing to get what she needed out of her downline and upline to move so fast.

I do agree however that the policies and procedures should be reviewed thoroughly prior to checking that box. Nonetheless, this person was fully aware of what she was doing and that it was grounds for termination. What has upset her is she wasn't smart enough not to get caught and vicious and sly enough not to care. A person who was ignorant enough to think because she made the company so much money that they could never let her go and a person with an ego (and a deluded outlook on law) of one of our US ex president's, "I am not a crook!"

She continues to promote her name and has such a strong desire to be in the spot light even more. If I were her, I would go underground for a while until this blew over. Not keep it up, because she is "ousted" on this. She owes this company thousands of dolor