Will the first world nations have to stop testing advanced nuclear weapons in order to coax third world nations from developing nuclear weapons and into signing nuclear peace accords?

Can the first world nations afford not to have nuclear weapons to stop a rogue nation like Iran which threatened to blow Israel off the map, sends insurgents into neighboring nations and then chooses to support International Terrorist organizations like Hamas?

It is interesting that to stop a nation from doing the unthinkable you are almost forced to do the unthinkable yourself. Yet every nation including Israel has the right to protect its self from such things.

The United States as much as we would like too, cannot get rid of its nuclear arsenal or stop the further development of more strategic nuclear weapons if it is to survive in a world with emerging nations with fundamental extremist leadership. Leadership which threatens to break ranks with all peaceful nations of the world, threaten them and eventually use nuclear weapons to prove a point.

Indeed the day they do, their point of their fundamentalism is a mute point in that, it will no longer matter who was right and who was wrong, the damage is done forever and at that point, well it is just too late. I hope you will consider all this in 2006.

"Lance Winslow" - Online Think Tank forum board. If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives, come think with Lance; http://www.WorldThinkTank.net/wttbbs/