The Filming of Killing Would Seem a Greater Atrocity than the Act of Murder Itself

The saying is true taking into account the processes that happen in our society nowadays. The fact is that the film industry makes a great influence on our conscience, sometimes even more significant than we think. We are apt not to notice that until the consequences come. As the situation shows the number of violence increases, particularly goes down in age, and the attitude towards violence is getting more tolerant and indifferent. To my mind, the film industry and modern pop culture encourage that much.

I do agree with this statement though it sounds like exaggeration it must be so. I would say that the filming of killing would seem like premeditation of the murder because it includes creating the idea, thinking through the details and fulfilling it in the script and film. Thus the filmmaker must have a good imagination of a criminal and develop it. So the career in production of such films can be as dangerous as the activity of criminals because the act of creation needs a concentration of mental power and active involvement in the matter. It is a constant strain of nerves, thoughts, and it can take the whole time for creating the details of the plot, so the author can be fully absorbed with his product, and this involvement is easy to grow into obsession. Where is the difference between filmmaker creating the plot of a next terror film and a criminal premeditating the terror act? Where is a border between thought and action? What is the guarantee that the ideas of murder will remain only ideas and would not come into fulfillment?

It is also true that the films can give criminals not only impulses but practical ideas because the films try to be true in detail and close to life