CEOs And Boards Are Locked In A Spiral Of Doom
PERMISSION TO REPUBLISH: This article may be republished in
newsletters and on web sites provided attribution is provided to
the author, and it appears with the included copyright, resource
box and live web site link. Email notice of intent to publish is
appreciated but not required: mail to: brent@actionleadership.com
Word count: 700
Summary: The relationship between boards of director and CEOs
are vital to the well-being of any company. Many boards and CEOs
misunderstand that relationship and so are locked into a "spiral
of doom." The author describes the spiral and ways to stop it.
CEOs And Boards Are Locked In A Spiral Of Doom by Brent Filson
American CEOs are dropping like flies. Boards, armed with new
federal rules and stock exchange requirements coming in the wake
of the corporate scandals of the past few years, are getting rid
of underperforming CEOs at record rates. This trend is all the
more notable because it's happening during an improving economy
and stock market.
However, the real reasons for the CEO bloodbath are being
overlooked. Analysts pin the bloodbath on the CEOs. But it's not
just the CEOs who are failing. Boards are failing too. Working
with thousands of leaders worldwide for more than twenty years,
I've learned that there is a "spiral of doom" in the
relationship between many company boards and their CEOs. Most
boards are clueless as to what leadership skills are needed for
CEOs to succeed. So they hire clueless CEOs. Clueless boards
hiring clueless CEOs -- it's the classic spiral of doom.
The reason boards and CEOs misunderstand leadership is that
recently there has been a tectonic shift in leadership skills
CEOs need to succeed. In the 80s and 90s, the autocratic CEO
reigned supreme. Many companies were like slow-moving ocean
liners with autocratic captains giving orders to mates and mates
giving orders to the crew. But today the combination of
globalization and new, differently-manageable generations coming
into the workforce is creating the need for new kinds of
leadership. CEO leadership is no longer like piloting an ocean
liner but like white water canoeing that calls for flattened
organizations that can change rapidly and accurately,
decentralized decision-making, motivated employees, and
inspiring relationships.
The era of the autocratic leader is over. Yet most boards know
no other way of leadership but autocracy.
Here are three things boards and CEOs can do together to stop
the spiral of doom.
(1) Be aware of the crucial differences between autocratic
leadership and the new leadership. It's easy to spot autocratic
leaders. They come with a "my-way-or-the-highway" attitude.
They're long on order-giving and short on listening, great at
micro-managing and poor at motivation, great at caring for the
company's results and poor at promoting the welfare of the
people who must achieve those results.
The new leaders, on the other hand, ask a lot of questions. They
consult with people rather than command them. They have a
passion not only for achieving results but for promoting the
well-being of the people who must achieve the results. They
listen well. They have the courage to allow others to fail. They
challenge people to be better than they think they can be. They
are continually enhancing the leadership skills of others. And
they understand that rewards and punishments are the lowest
forms of leadership.
(2) By all means, don't hire autocrats. Select CEOs who are
skilled in the new leadership. This means taking great pains in
the interview process to have candidates talk about their
leadership philosophy, ways they have manifested that
philosophy, and ways they intend to manifest it as a CEO.
(3) Continually monitor and evaluate CEOs on how they're
carrying out the new leadership activities. Boards and CEOs must
put into place comprehensive and systematic leadership
processes. They must hold themselves accountable for those
processes. Board meetings must be consistently devoted to
leadership issues. When CEOs report to boards on the state of
the company, they must also report on the "state of leadership"
-- showing how leadership is getting results and how the
leadership capabilities and responsibilities of their senior
leaders, middle managers and small-unit leaders are being
constantly upgraded.
Autocratic CEOs are maestros at getting the wrong results or the
right results in the wrong ways. Boards who bring them on buy a
ticket to ride on the spiral of doom.
The time is now for boards and CEOs to get off the ride and
bring in CEOs who recognize that the best leadership is not
about what leaders do to people but what they do with people.
2005