Prosecutors with political ambitions are known to modify the truth or withhold evidence in order to get a conviction. It is so common in fact that the greater the political ambitions the greater the unethical ness of their tenure as a prosecutor. It is for this reason that we must do a background on every case that John Kerry falsified as a prosecutor in order to maintain such a high conviction rate. After all political ambitions for President of the United States are great indeed an there is a significant motivation to cheat? I believe John Kerry kicked his dog and unless he can prove otherwise we ought to make a note of it.

It is not that John Kerry himself is such a bad gentleman, I do not even know him. The problem lies in the fact that almost all District Attorneys and State Attorneys General are somewhat corrupt. Some say they are corrupt because the law makes it tough for them to convict those who are corrupt in the first place. Yet if you think carefully on that logic it holds no water. For instance recently a Federal Agent lied under oath to convict Martha Stewart for supposedly lying while she was not under oath about a crime she did not commit and was not even a crime at all. This of course is one small example in the annals of history, albeit a recent one. John Kerry in his recent bid for President had somewhat misrepresented the facts about his bravery in combat and this leads one to question his service as a prosecutor. After all one of his statements and major comments about his experience as a leader was that he had put away people for the rest of their lives while he was a prosecutor. Well, that is good if in fact they were guilty. My question is;