Third World Debt - A Solution
Let's not pretend that third world debt is about wise investment
of borrowed money in order to develop a country's economy more
quickly. If it were so, the countries which borrowed the most
would be the ones doing well. Without getting into statistics,
I'll just point out that debt is more often hurting these
economies than helping them. Debt is there, though, so what can
be done about it?
Third World Debt Renunciation
To suggest that countries should renounce their debt may sound
too radical at first, but not once you understand the nature of
international debt. With the guise of helping to develop a
country's resources, the world bank or various governments loan
money to a third world government. Lenders usually don't want
just to make interest, but also to develop something that will
benefit them, like oil or lumber resources they need. Also, it
is commonly expected that companies from the lending countries
will get large contracts for various development projects.
Of course, the corrupt government that receives the loan has
it's own ideas about what to do with the money. Altogether, many
corrupt officials, lending institutions, governments and
companies make money, while little real benefit trickles down to
the people of the borrowing country. The scoundrels are long
gone when the next government has to deal with the growing debt.
Then the lending countries, international monetary fund or world
bank step in to renegotiate the debt. They'll even loan more
money to alleviate a "crisis." The new deal comes with rules, of
course. The borrowing country may have to tax the people more
heavily, or encourage "cash" crops that can be sold to pay the
debt, instead of food crops to feed the people.
Third World Debt Relief
Consider this for a moment. A corrupt, often non-democratically
elected government borrows money for their own purposes, and it
is assumed that the citizens have an obligation to repay the
money. Now, if I borrow money in your name, would you feel
obligated to pay? Of course not! A new solution: When a new
government comes to power in any of these debt-ridden third
world countries, they should renounce all foreign debt, and stop
making payments at once. Neither they nor the people who
actually are taxed to pay it have any obligation to do so. This
should be announced as a moral decision to stop forcing people
to pay fr debt they did not incur. Taking the moral high ground
will reshape the whole debate.
Many will argue that any country which does this won't be able
to borrow again for a long time. Since debt has been more of a
problem, and not the solution to their economic woes, this is a
great benefit, isn't it? Let's make sure no one will lend to
future corrupt governments and leave the people burdened with
debt! Of course, debt is good when the money is used wisely.
While renouncing past debts, the new government can stabilize
expenditures and create a market system in which money will be
comfortably lent to many individual companies within the
country. The resulting economic growth will provide the future
tax base for public works. Letting the world lend to
value-producing companies instead of to inevitably corrupt
governments will go a long way towards solving the problems of
third world debt.