Kensington Palace and the Glorious Revolution
At some time, no doubt, upon our travels together, we will pass
by this royal palace, where once upon a time a prince and
princess used to live in happier days - namely the current heir
to the throne and the now deceased Lady Diana, who became the
Princess of Wales.
So you may ask, what on earth could be the direct connection
between this Royal Palace and a revolution that was known as
"Glorious"? Why glorious anyway, you may well ask? Well, there
we are - the story gets longer and longer, and eventually
disappears into the mists of time.
This royal palace, although nowadays no longer a principal royal
residence, is still used by certain members of the royal family
even after the recent death of the queen's sister, Princess
Margaret, the death of the Princess of Wales on 31st August
1997, and the departure of HRH Prince Charles, following the
separation of the couple in 1992.
The idea of this palace came about with accession of the Prince
of Orange, the Dutch Stadtholder, as our William III, who was
the son of the eldest daughter, Mary, of the executed (yes
executed, in 1646) King of Great Britain, King Charles I.
Interestingly, William III was married to an English Princess,
also called Mary, who was a daughter of Charles II's brother the
Duke of York, who himself became a King, namely James II. So
reader, if you are thinking "but this makes them cousins", then
you are quite correct.
It was the very abdication of James II and the act of fleeing
from Great Britain that brought his daughter back home as a
Queen in her own right. So again reader, if you have perceived
another apparent inconsistency, then you are right again: we did
have two monarchs reigning in their own right at the same time!
In fact the only time in British History. Thank God they were
married - otherwise we would have another revolution and perhaps
not such a glorious one. (Remember King Stephen and Matilda in
the 11th century? Perhaps you don't...)
Well, why was this revolution so glorious? The new King William
III was invited to invade by the nobility, and this invasion and
accession was entirely peaceful, as a result of the defection of
most of the English army officers, including and especially one
John Churchill. This change of leadership in our country lead to
our war with France over the question the Spanish succession.
This culminated in the Battle of Blenheim, hence Blenheim Palace
being gifted, by the next Monarch, Queen Anne, to the newly
created 1st Duke of Marlborough, the one and same John Churchill
who had changed his allegiance from James II!!
So leadership in those was still as much in the hands of the
monarch as Parliament. Incidentally it was from the need and
struggle to finance this war that the Bank of England was
created. Then, as today, banks seem to have far more to do with
lending money than being the keepers of funds. But we digress
from our original enquiries. Why was this Palace in Kensington
created when there were already perfectly acceptable ones in
Westminster?
Well there you are, the story becomes ever more unpredictable.
Would you believe it the answer is pollution - yes, pollution.
Am I being serious, am I being truthful? No, really I am! There
was a very great pollution problem back in those old times 300
years ago. even before the days of the Industrial Revolution.
Not from vehicles and modern machines, of course, but in those
days every house had quite a number of fires. In fact, open
fires were everywhere, causing far dirtier combustion than
today's relatively clean power machines.
So even in those days there was intensive smog in the areas
around Westminster, and Kensington was regarded as a country
area with wonderful fresh air. In fact the Duke of Nottingham's
house, which is what this was before its purchase in 1689, was
probably fairly isolated, before the Court Circle of Ministers,
advisers and supporters began building their dwellings around
the new royal palace.
You maybe surprised to know that the designer of St Paul's
Cathedral was also asked to carry out much modification to the
new palace, and this is still in evidence today. So in the
middle of his 35-year (1675-1710) supervision of the rebuilding
of the Cathedral, this great architect (not that he would have
been known as that in the 17th century) was asked to effectively
engineer a new royal residence. Wouldn't be possible in today's
world of Euro laws trying to enforce 35 hour weeks, would it?
So now you are in the know, to a certain extent, about how the
Glorious Revolution is connected to Kensington Palace, why the
Glorious Revolution was thought to be so, and why Kensington
Palace is situated where it is and why it was created in the
first place. And if a Blue Badge Guide had not told you these
things, would you have been thinking about them as you slid past
Kensington Palace? Possibly like may of today's young, you would
only have thought of Kensington Palace in connection with our
sad modern Princess of Wales and the carpet of flowers as far as
the eyes could see, all around the Palace, in the days leading
up to her funeral.
So can you afford not to have the past explained to you as
today's top visual highlights are pointed out?