There are some real scum out there in the academic field who will try to debunk bona fide scientific work and research by calling them Ambiguous Groups, as if to label their years of research as anomalies or flukes? As if such research by a few scientific groups, which have repeatable results are not worthy of academic thought.

Beware of anyone who calls a top scientific university or research group an Ambiguous Group only to purport their version of some theory. And if someone attempts to debunk in this way, ask them straight up to state their case and theory, as this maybe a clear indication of their true motives. Recently some scoundrel attempted such a debunking in an online think tank and stated: