Turning Big Profits On Frozen Pond
WHEN 55 BEATS 65
I had an interesting conversation with a colleague yesterday as
he quizzed me about the NHL and whether the rule changes made
handicapping the sport more or less difficult. Looking at the
numbers I responded my NHL program is clipping along at a 55.5%
success rate pitting wins versus losses and that number appeared
pretty much in line with the previous 5 seasons documented here
at The Professional Handicappers League. He seemed taken back by
that 55% figure and assumed that number would be higher
considering my multiple NHL Hockey Handicapping Titles. I
assured him that 55% is a solid number and delivers strong
profits when games meet my strict criteria before being offered
to my Clients.
NHL Handicapping is a different animal and moneylines are
primarily the chosen method for wager. When screening NHL games
there is a wide discrepancy in lines and more often than not the
teams expected to win offer very little value. I draw the line
at moneylines greater than -130 deeming them of little value to
my clients when weighing wager versus risk potential. You don't
need a handicapper to tell you to play Detroit over St Louis
when Detroit offers a -190 moneyline. My 7 year old son Scott
could provide that play. Consider a heavy juice play and the
catastrophic results should that team lose. It's essentially the
same as losing 2 games rather than 1.
My NHL program to this point in the season has recommended 141
plays with documented lines. 73 of those plays carried thin
juice in the -101 to -130 range, while being offset by 68 plays
offering positive money in the +101 to +240 range. This is where
my no chalk program separates itself from other NHL systems.
This is also why our 55.5% program leads The Professional
Handicappers League comfortably with 2,208 Units won despite
being back in the pack in winning percentage.
The NHL has games on most nights and in some cases their can be
12 or more games scheduled and available for wager. With my
selective screening however their may be 1-3 or even in some
instances none that meet my strict standards providing value
with a strong possibility of success. These are certainly
essential factors to consider and this guideline is one I follow
diligently. My Clients are above all the most important
consideration I have and this program is geared for them
specifically. I'm proud of its uniqueness and its track record
for being the best in this business. Most importantly I can
assure you my high standards will never change in this regard.
Sometimes the numbers can be deceptive and an inauspicious 55%
can be easily overlooked. The trick is to look a little deeper
and compare these numbers for what they represent. Competing NHL
programs with 65% winners may appear more appealing but in
essence these programs may contrast dramatically. Units Won is
the Bottom Line,and that's the number you can take to the bank!