Effective Talent Management
When three leading magazines (Harvard Business Review, Business
Week, and Training & Development) all have cover stories about
talent management the same month, it is safe to say you are
looking at a hot topic.
Talent management (the recruiting, training, and retaining of
good workers) has had many names over the years, but it is
certainly not new. While the topic is not new, how we think
about it has evolved over time.
As early as the late 19th century, business organizations turned
to universities for help developing their employees. In 1881,
Joseph Wharton (co-founder of Bethlehem Steel) persuaded the
University of Pennsylvania to create an undergraduate business
education program. Soon after, Dartmouth and Harvard followed
Wharton's lead.
In the mid-twentieth century, universities shifted their focus
from factory workers to executives. As the importance of manual
labor declined, universities abandoned the "hard issues" for the
theoretical.
As university programs became more irrelevant, business
organizations responded with corporate universities (CUs). CUs
(beginning with GE's in Crotonville, NY) offered
company-specific training that was relevant to their companies'
real-world practice.
Training of managers and executives outside of the university
setting has become quite sophisticated. In addition to executive
MBA programs, both executive coaching and action learning are
now widely available. Executive coaching offers one-on-one
guidance on many of the emotional intelligence or "soft" skills.
Action learning is designed to allow managers and executives to
work on real problems and to learn simultaneously.
So what's the problem Mike? If organizational learning has
become more sophisticated, aren't companies more profitable? Not
necessarily. These sophisticated training programs are
expensive. Do we know the ROI (return on investment) for these
massive investments of time and money?
Also, many companies neglect the fact that training is only part
of effective talent management. Talent management also includes
recruiting and retention.
Is your company training the right people? Training the wrong
people is a waste of limited organizational resources. After you
have trained the right people, can you retain them? If not, you
are simply training good people for your competitors.
During my consulting work, I have often suspected that most
companies are not handling talent management effectively. A
recent Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) study
confirmed my suspicions. SHRM found that only 49% of HR
professionals believe their organizations effectively identify
high-potential employees. That means 51% of companies are
wasting a lot of time and money.
Is your organizations part of the 49%, or the 51%?