Why Leadership Matters in Professional Practices
"A leader has two important characteristics; first he is
going somewhere; second he is able to persuade others to go with
him." Robespierre
How many of the people who run professional firms have achieved
their positions as a result of planned career development? Or
through assessment centres, or their ability as leaders and
managers? I wonder whether a large number are still there
because of some family connection, who they know and bring to
the firm as clients, length of service or revenues generated?
This does not mean that there has to be a problem with those at
the top as some will be capable and some will be natural
leaders. However, how many could be better? When I have worked
with groups in professional firms, the senior people have
generally admitted to having no real training in leadership and
often admit to lacking the skills. Those at lower levels
commented about a lack of leadership, direction or support.
Why does it matter? Fundamentally, all businesses need clear
leadership from the top. There needs to be clear strategy and
direction. The top leaders will set the culture of the
organisation too. Too many organisations are "over-managed and
under-led" to quote Warren Bennis. There is a difference between
leadership and management. Managers get things done, operating
within the culture and the rules. Leaders create the direction,
developing the culture and rules and taking the people with
them. This article will raise some questions about what happens
if you do not address the leadership challenge for your firm and
shares some ideas for how prevent them. As your markets change,
the competitive forces become even more threatening a lack of
executive and strategic leadership might prove to be terminal!!
However, if you start to apply the principles you can create a
more robust and resilient business and, if you wish to, achieve
even greater things.
Leadership itself is a word which can trigger a wide-ranging
debate if you want to reach a consensus about what it means or
what it is. There are hundreds of definitions within the
business press alone. To add to the complication, it is
generally accepted that there are different levels of
leadership, from that required for a team leader or first line
supervisor to that of a CEO of a major blue chip! If we think
about leadership at the top of an organisation, there are some
key elements they need attention: - having an eye on the future
and the horizon
- taking a medium and long-range view
- looking outside and inside the organisation
- challenging the status quo
- setting objectives
- inspiring trust
- asks questions and listens
- develops others
If you had to look at the leadership you, or others, are
providing in your firm, how many of these aspects to they
demonstrate consistently. My experience is that too many
"leaders" in professional firms are too hands-on. This leads to
a lack of clear strategy and direction compounded by a lack of
thorough market awareness. There is often a reluctance to change
and little is done in a proactive way. The senior people may
provide sound professional guidance and mentoring, but they
rarely focus on developing the staff throughout the firm. The
actual people-management skills are not necessarily good either.
These problems are not the fault of the individuals, they are
effectively sins of omission. There has been little, or no,
formal or structured training or development in management or
leadership skills - sometimes reinforced by the "I didn't get
where I am with training" mindset!!
"Reason and judgment are the qualities of a leader."
Tacitus
There are a number of qualities which good leaders can be
expected to possess and demonstrate. These would include:
ability to articulate the vision for the organisation,
department or function
problem-solving and making decisions, especially difficult ones!
effecting change
acting with honesty and integrity
leading by example (ie the way they behave and act, not doing
the other jobs
self-management
communication and influencing skills.
How would you assess yourself, or other leaders in your firm? If
there was to be a 360