Leadership Development And Jumping Out of Airships
PERMISSION TO REPUBLISH: This article may be republished in
newsletters and on web sites provided attribution is provided to
the author, and it appears with the included copyright, resource
box and live web site link. Email notice of intent to publish is
appreciated but not required: mail to: brent@actionleadership.com
Word count: 885
=========================================== Summary: The
Leadership Development function in many a corporation has often
been viewed as a sideline when compared to such functions as
sales and marketing. Yet Leadership Development can and should
be seen as integral to a company's bottom and top lines. Here
are two simple ways to make it happen.
=========================================== Leadership
Development And Jumping Out of Airships by Brent Filson A German
silent film melodrama depicts an airship bombing London during
World War I. Lit up by searchlights and strafed by fighters, the
crippled airship loses altitude as the captain frantically
jettisons dispensable gear to lighten weight. Eventually, the
only weight left is human. So the captain orders members of the
crew overboard. A grisly scene unfolds as the airmen, one by
one, without parachutes, step up to the hatch, salute the
captain and the first mate, then jump to their deaths.
Lightened, the airship returns safely to Germany. That scene is
not a relic. It's happening in corporations frequently these
days, clearly not as fact but metaphor. Companies, shot up in
the cross fires of increasingly competitive markets, must
lighten their loads to get earnings' growth buoyancy. The
captains are jettisoning all but the indispensable employees.
Commonly, one of the first functions to be ordered out is the
training function -- in particular, leadership training or
leadership development. Many company heads view such training as
dispensable as the airship crew in the melodrama. Yet leadership
isn't dispensable to business success. It's absolutely
indispensable. Good leaders are far more important to the long
term success of companies than good products. All organizations
that fail to get, keep, and develop good leaders eventually
founder. This isn't a secret. Most leaders know this. Here's the
secret: The fact that leadership development is viewed as
dispensable is not the captain's making. It's the crew's making.
The blame lies with the people in charge of the leadership
development. They simply have not defined leadership development
in indispensable ways for results. Sure, they have defined such
development for training results but not for the results that
really count, business results. And when training people focus
on training results not business results, they are always put at
the front when the superfluous are told to line up to leap. What
is leadership but results -- not training results, business
results. If leaders are not getting their business results, they
are not leading. Results can be defined in many ways,
productivity, operating efficiencies, sales growth, cost
reductions, etc., but leadership development has no real value
unless it is helping the leaders get those results. Here are two
simple ways to position your role to notably increase your value
to your company.
1. Define results. Forget about training results. Forget about
training objectives. They're dispensable gear. Throw them
overboard. What are the business results of the leaders you are
developing? If you are dealing with people in manufacturing,
then focus on having your development programs help improve
operating efficiencies. If you have sales people in those
programs, focus on their getting increased sales results within
a certain time after they complete your program. Whoever has
signed up for your programs, challenge them to use the tools you
give them to get results short and long term. For instance, at
the beginning of your programs, ask participants, "What results
do you have to get? And what are the most important challenges
you have in getting them?" Then bring them the tools to help
them get those results. What they learn is worthless unless it
is tied to what is most valuable in their jobs and careers. It's
worse than worthless, it's a downright stumbling block since
that learning demands that they spend their time away from
pursuing their real job objectives. 2. Measure those results.
There is no value in business without measurements. Trainers who
ignore this truth are put in the line before the open hatch when
the company starts going down. Those trainers typically show
their value by demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of their
programs. Cost-effective, baloney! I don't know of any
organization where "cost-effective" ultimately doesn't mean
"cheap." Cost-effectiveness is the worst way to position
leadership development programs. Cost-effective programs are the
least valuable programs of all. Once we start defining our
programs by how cheap they are, we show that we don't understand
leadership or development -- and so cheapen our value to the
company. Don't make leadership programs inexpensive. Make them
expensive! -- expensive to the company if those programs are not
instituted. We can only show their true importance by
demonstrating the hard, measured, business-focused results
participants achieve after taking the programs. At the end of
your sessions, have participants write a "value received" letter
in which they detail the hard measured results that they intend
to get when they use your leadership tools. Follow up 35-days
later to insure they have gotten those results or are about to
get them. If participants in a leadership course don't receive
an R.O. I. that is at least five to ten times greater than the
investment they made in that course, give them their money back.
And why not? If they can't get big increases in their hard,
measured results, it's the course's fault. It hasn't helped them
develop as leaders. Without results, leadership has no meaning.
Leadership development is too important to be demeaned by having
it fulfill training objectives. Enhance its importance by having
it fulfill business objectives. In doing so, we will change the
scenario on our metaphorical airship. Instead of ordering the
crew out, the captain will say, "We can't afford to lose this
crew member. Stay here! First mate, jump!"
============================= 2004